| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140821 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 30 '22 at 13:38 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4690-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
76.1%
Very good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
50% 377 Pts
|
23% 370 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.6%
Poor
|
29% 37.9 fps
|
27% 33.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 264 249 244 238 232 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
84% 374 MB/s
|
162% 54.4 MB/s
|
271% 362 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
85GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 231 233 245 246 246 MB/s
|
77.6%
Very good
|
52% 232 MB/s
|
145% 48.7 MB/s
|
144% 192 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
621GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 188 189 185 188 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
113% 154 MB/s
|
161% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-064.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
60.1%
Good
|
59% 20.8 GB/s
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
57% 70.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,989 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 458x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 296x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 222x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 299x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 201x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 172x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $297 |