Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H470 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200515
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '22 at 13:33
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 83.4 1-Core 145 2-Core 292 94% 173 Pts	4-Core 565 8-Core 1,032 96% 798 Pts	64-Core 1,500 93% 1,500 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (64 fps cap detected)	51.5% Above average	Lighting 63.6 Reflection 65.1 Parallax 61.3 52% 63.3 fps	MRender 58.5 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 63.3 51% 62 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1465 1984 2052 893 827 824 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2,373 Write 2,096 Mixed 2,132 SusWrite 1,341 446% 1,985 MB/s	4K Read 60.5 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 77.7 251% 83.6 MB/s	DQ Read 955 DQ Write 682 DQ Mixed 815 610% 817 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 442%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GB 656 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 238GB free Firmware: MVT0300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 317 318 318 318 317 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 480 Mixed 418 SusWrite 332 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 51.2 170% 58.6 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 352 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 120%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 251GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2200 786 756 755 754 754 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 2551 Write 2088 Mixed 1,787 SusWrite 1,001 415% 1,857 MB/s	4K Read 61.8 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 83.4 274% 94.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,090 DQ Write 855 DQ Mixed 941 713% 962 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GF1X16LIII43-12-K 2x16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.4% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 20.7 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 23.3 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 115%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	21x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	11x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	9x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	16x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $581

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16