Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT One Computer Core i5-4670K, 4x (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock B365M Pro4
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190515
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '22 at 12:16
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 86.7 1-Core 134 2-Core 270 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 644 73% 569 Pts	64-Core 715 44% 715 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% MSI(1462 3973) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.2% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 101 Parallax 93.4 86% 99.8 fps	MRender 152 Gravity 88.1 Splatting 73.1 82% 104 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 53 54 26 12 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,277 Write 804 Mixed 720 SusWrite 107 161% 727 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 49.2 203% 80.6 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 773 DQ Mixed 219 262% 442 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 209%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 103GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 191 81 82 81 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 456 Write 435 Mixed 393 SusWrite 158 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 34.9 115% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 357 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 121%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 18,934 Mixed 67.3 6,282% 9,500 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8266.C8FP 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 859B CT8G4DFS8266.C8FP 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 28.6 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 22 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

GPU
GeForce GTX 1060 6GBNvidiaBench 56%, 56,417 samples	8x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $54Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	5x
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	5x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	4x

RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 76%, 1,610 samples	3x
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 78%, 2,402 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	3x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $156

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16