Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP OMEN Laptop 15-en0240ng (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8788
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '22 at 17:34
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H 27,218 User benchmarks, average bench 70% FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 136 2-Core 268 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 847 82% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,068 66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile) 33,798 User benchmarks, average bench 42% HP(103C 8788) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3015 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Lighting 58.9 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 57.2 48% 61.1 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 53.4 Splatting 53.3 46% 57 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 47%
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 8788) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.1 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 20.8 12% 18.3 fps	MRender 15.1 Gravity 16.4 Splatting 17.1 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 420GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1965 974 795 801 796 794 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,435 Write 2,157 Mixed 1,737 SusWrite 1,021 411% 1,837 MB/s	4K Read 52.3 4K Write 95.9 4K Mixed 66.9 216% 71.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,023 DQ Write 704 DQ Mixed 812 620% 846 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 296%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB 6,019 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 663GB free Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1466 1472 1471 1465 309 781 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1,409 Write 1,432 Mixed 1,092 SusWrite 1,161 287% 1,273 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 64 210% 71.5 MB/s	DQ Read 686 DQ Write 819 DQ Mixed 274 339% 593 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 299%
Intenso Sata III 500GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 399GB free Firmware: 2501 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 315 316 318 318 316 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 333 Write 315 Mixed 296 SusWrite 315 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 19.9 84% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 39.3 66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB 3,257 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 35.8 114% 39.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 21.9 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

CPU
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	4x
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000P 1TBNvmeBench 216%, 6,019 samples	1x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	1x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	1x

RAM
KF3200C20S4/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 80%, 1,312 samples	3x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 86%, 3,257 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16