Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory45.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 16:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 225
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 661
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 196
Parallax 197
138% 187 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 181
Splatting 127
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 137 90 86 72 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 396
Write 371
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 124
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 20.6
100% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 125
130% 210 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
185GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1199 975 943 769 702 691 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,969
Write 1,833
Mixed 1806
SusWrite 880
364% 1,622 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 75.9
244% 80.8 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 689
519% 698 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 240%
Great: 410%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 119 122 121 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 184
Write 194
Mixed 92
SusWrite 122
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 26.6
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 9.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback