PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds) |
Memory | 26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170331 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 28 '17 at 01:40 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
144%
Outstanding
|
|||
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
828GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 400GB (2008)
98GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLE8G4D30AEEA.K16FE 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3333 MHz
|
130%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 200x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 169x |
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples | 97x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 177x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 86x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 63x |
SSD | |
---|---|
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 42x |
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples | 40x |
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $1,076 |