Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '22 at 10:26
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Memory 97.7 1-Core 146 2-Core 293 99% 179 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 1,044 94% 792 Pts	64-Core 1,554 96% 1,554 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% MSI(1462 C724) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 184 Reflection 187 Parallax 198 150% 190 fps	MRender 204 Gravity 165 Splatting 0.1 88% 123 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 183 182 178 205 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1,020 Write 393 Mixed 381 SusWrite 193 109% 497 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 54.2 196% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 660 DQ Write 463 DQ Mixed 294 292% 472 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 144%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB 44,418 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 391GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 447 451 443 437 449 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 436 Mixed 437 SusWrite 446 102% 450 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 53.8 179% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 294 240% 343 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 123%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 516GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 465 469 467 460 468 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 438 Mixed 384 SusWrite 466 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 47.9 176% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 355 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 15.8 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 20 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 47.5 84% 47.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	110x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	154x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $1,030

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16