Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4110 546 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 66.2 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 158 59% 102 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 570 51% 432 Pts	64-Core 1585 98% 1585 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Lighting 49.8 Reflection 59.8 Parallax 48.7 41% 52.8 fps	MRender 47.9 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 58.3 44% 52.6 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TB8W256G1001 256GB 1,158 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 192 156 186 192 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 368 Write 358 Mixed 256 SusWrite 177 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 25.9 88% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 24 19% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 12 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.1% Poor	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 10.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.2 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41101stBench 62%, 546 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	1x

SSD
SD9TB8W256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 80%, 1,158 samples	1x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16