PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210708 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '22 at 17:31 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i9-9900K-$500
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
84% 150 Pts
|
75% 600 Pts
|
45% 722 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 3080-$870
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
193%
Outstanding
|
234% 279 fps
|
179% 232 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 225 143 130 130 196 MB/s
|
75.9%
Very good
|
49% 219 MB/s
|
139% 47.4 MB/s
|
86% 196 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
81GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 259 143 121 71 42 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
81% 363 MB/s
|
177% 60 MB/s
|
264% 353 MB/s
|
![]() WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
745GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 147 148 147 147 MB/s
|
85.3%
Excellent
|
96% 131 MB/s
|
197% 1.5 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 109 109 109 111 MB/s
|
63.8%
Good
|
74% 101 MB/s
|
171% 1.17 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
76.9%
Very good
|
77% 27 GB/s
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
57% 70.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i9-9900KIntel $500Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 3,848x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $275Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 3,736x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $120Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 1,536x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $378Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,052x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 989x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 800x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $1,362 |