Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '22 at 23:24
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141 4,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 83.4 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 90.9 53% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 225 24% 194 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 047B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.9 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 635GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.4 5.9 6.4 6.1 7.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 851GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.4 7.4 7.4 7.8 6.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 7TB free Firmware: D785 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 66 55 44 52 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 140 Write 152 Mixed 46.6 SusWrite 52.6 71% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1 350% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 92%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 757GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 15 17 16 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 159 Write 26.4 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 16.1 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 51%
WD easystore 2647 5TB 3,858 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 2647 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 9.8 9.3 9.3 9.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 17.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	209x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	65x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16