Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 120 49% 83 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 188 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-256V2S-HP 256GB 1,560 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2C03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 204 184 183 164 198 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 409 Write 265 Mixed 104 SusWrite 199 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 25.8 84% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 172 134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 92%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 2GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 16.4 Write 5.2 Mixed 5 9% 8.87 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 16 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	256x
Radeon R7 M260XAMDBench 6%, 148 samples	2x
Radeon R7 M260AMDBench 6%, 91 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 68%, 1,925 samples	12x
MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GBCrucialBench 84%, 1,835 samples	11x
SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 83%, 1,918 samples	11x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	32x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	13x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 6,133 samples	10x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16