Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 67.3 32% 51 Pts	4-Core 78.4 8-Core 130 13% 104 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1218) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.67% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 6.2 4% 4.9 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 8.8 6% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NFS011SA351-6007000 512GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 13 13 20 12 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 508 Write 18.4 Mixed 11.6 SusWrite 15.3 29% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 0% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 2x4GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	27.9% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 9.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 2.5 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	1x
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	1x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	2x

SSD
NFS011SA351-6007000 512GBBench 72%, 66 samples	1x

RAM
AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 2x4GBAdataBench 59%, 130 samples	1x
AM1P24HC4U1-B9RS 1x4GBAdataBench 34%, 1,739 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16