PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120524 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 26 '22 at 02:01 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 72 70 53 62 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung PM830 128GB
37GB free
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 89 92 97 113 109 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
402GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 113 116 117 118 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 434x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 383x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 296x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 104x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 104x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 99x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $812 |