Acer Aspire M3900

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EG43M
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100601
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '22 at 09:15
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5700-$22 20,872 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 62 1-Core 38.6 2-Core 35.2 33% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 43.2 8-Core 41.2 6% 42.2 Pts	64-Core 61.4 4% 61.4 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	4.27% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 6.4 Parallax 4.9 4% 5.53 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.5 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.27% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 109 111 113 107 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.2% Poor	Read 85.9 Write 102 Mixed 91.4 SusWrite 108 22% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 10.1 32% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 131 95% 123 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 125%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 574GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 92 94 95 95 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 65.5 Write 80.2 Mixed 45.7 SusWrite 92.7 52% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 63 65 66 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	45% Average	Read 90.1 Write 60.9 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 66.6 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 80CE M378B5773SB0-CK0 0707 GU512303EP0202 GU512303EP0202 8GB 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3900 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3900

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	8x
Pentium E6700Intel $199Bench 40%, 5,273 samples	4x
Pentium E5800Intel $58Bench 37%, 8,890 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 4x2GBUnknownBench 37%, 604 samples	3x
BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 2x4GBCrucialBench 48%, 1,673 samples	2x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 0198 ACR128X64D3U1333C9 3GBUnknownBench 18%, 108 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $57

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16