Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2130-$50 6,759 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 138 59% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 196 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3091) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.7 1% 1 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2OA60W Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 54.5 Write 44 Mixed 30.3 32% 42.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 46%
hp v165w 4GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 5307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 19.2 Write 4.8 Mixed 8.7 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 859B CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16