Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive491% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900F-$465
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 212
2-Core 417
123% 237 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,537
134% 1,140 Pts
64-Core 2,852
176% 2,852 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 111%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Gainward(10B0 F293) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 217
Parallax 209
193% 221 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 156
Splatting 139
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 158%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3383 3477 3030 1746 1735 1720 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
491% Outstanding
Read 3,056
Write 3,529
Mixed 3,186
SusWrite 2,515
694% 3,072 MB/s
4K Read 86.6
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 128
426% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1,996
DQ Write 1,718
DQ Mixed 1,856
1,392% 1857 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 491%
Great: 508%
SSD 1TB 1TB
839GB free
Firmware: V8442c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 98 77 50 22 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 475
Write 346
Mixed 335
SusWrite 76.6
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 35
130% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 173
131% 174 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 259%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
2TB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1889 1961 1957 1935 1929 1928 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 1,139
Write 1,907
Mixed 1,327
SusWrite 1,933
359% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 279
4K Mixed 87.5
343% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 1,828
DQ Mixed 1,311
1,038% 1,417 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 333%
Great: 307%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
2TB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1886 1955 1958 1928 1923 1921 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 1,903
Mixed 1,316
SusWrite 1,928
354% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 87.9
345% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1108
DQ Write 1,841
DQ Mixed 1,305
1,037% 1418 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 331%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 64GB
3467, 3467, 3467, 3467 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 42.2
124% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 32.8
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 118%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 9,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X DDR4 - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,488
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback