| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Csl-computer A0000001 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK H110M-PLUS |
| Memory | 26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170316 |
| Uptime | 12.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '22 at 22:22 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.2%
Good
|
73% 127 Pts
|
40% 313 Pts
|
21% 346 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.1%
Above average
|
58% 82.4 fps
|
56% 68.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 22 72 18 105 31 MB/s
|
22.5%
Poor
|
21% 94.1 MB/s
|
41% 13.4 MB/s
|
11% 15 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
859GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 194 195 194 195 194 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
119% 163 MB/s
|
143% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.9%
Very good
|
74% 25.8 GB/s
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
52% 77.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Csl-computer A0000001
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 237x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 159x |
| Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 373x |
| RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 96x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 76x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $648 |