Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8320-$244
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 131
58% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 370
39% 305 Pts
64-Core 389
26% 389 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.7% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 60.8
46% 62.4 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 54.3
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 55%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 116 134 147 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 245
Write 187
Mixed 216
SusWrite 135
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 27.2
97% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 151
115% 152 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB
6TB free
Firmware: 4002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 242 232 244 251 250 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 177
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 235
128% 176 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$210
93GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 156 152 154 156 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 144
Write 138
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 150
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HX318C10FK/8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 60 27.2" 1920 1080 GSM5B08 LG Ultra HD
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $755
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $399Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback