Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 20:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$138
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 868
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.8% Very good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 122
Parallax 75.2
71% 95 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 93.3
Splatting 81.5
78% 95.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$76
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 410 418 422 426 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 422
Mixed 413
SusWrite 410
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 44.3
149% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 184
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 125%
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
172GB free
Firmware: AP55
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 135 138 137 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 136
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 136
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$107
150GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 72 73 73 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 84.2
Write 72.1
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 72.2
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 65%
WD WD3200BUDT-63DPZY0 320GB
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 76 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 67.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 74.2
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 49%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
53GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 86 88 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 77.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 86.6
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 43
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 37.8
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 17,402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 136%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,143
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $415Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $550Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $397Nvidia RTX 3050 $280Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback