Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
6 days ago, 6 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 19:32
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$194
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 168
2-Core 327
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 950
96% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,128
70% 1,128 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
Gigabyte(1458 3670) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 59.3
51% 63.2 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 54
50% 60.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 55%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0L2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,199
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,303
381% 1,719 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 83.1
296% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,043
784% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 262%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$169
930GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2490
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,656
484% 2175 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 87.2
295% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,513
DQ Write 1,191
DQ Mixed 1,327
1,000% 1,344 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11
58GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 123
Write 48.2
Mixed 12.4
59% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
50% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 123GB
104GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 34.1
Write 6.9
Mixed 24.2
24% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.5
234% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 240 24.5" 1280 720 DELA101 DELL AW2518HF
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $848
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $399Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback