Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GD
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 30.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
63% 126 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 552
59% 471 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Asus(1043 12FF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 22.8
18% 24.1 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 16.9
18% 23.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18%
Great: 27%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$50
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 184 56 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 809
Write 751
Mixed 675
SusWrite 113
131% 587 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 32.9
110% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 216
218% 346 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 209%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
91GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 69 68 69 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 101
Write 95.8
Mixed 50
SusWrite 60.8
100% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 4% 53 86 30 120 15.5" 1536 864 NCP0036
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $50
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $415Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $550Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $397Nvidia RTX 3050 $280Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback