Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 12:31
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$251
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 896
89% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,505
93% 1,505 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 59.8
52% 62.9 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 59.3
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 307 307 307 304 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 452
Mixed 450
SusWrite 305
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 58
193% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 128%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
1TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 1367 1366 1396 1395 1404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,514
Write 1,352
Mixed 1046
SusWrite 1,380
298% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 79.4
263% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 323
398% 704 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 266%
Great: 282%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$110
447GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 456 455 461 462 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 450
Mixed 392
SusWrite 458
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 46.8
164% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
682GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 123 142 147 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 133
Write 121
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 133
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$200
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 33.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 33.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC207 PHL 241E1
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 17,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $203

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $399Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback