Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 11:19
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 97
2-Core 171
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 431
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.2% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 113
Parallax 82.5
80% 98 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 67.1
62% 75.9 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$158
938GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 327 159 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 451
Write 328
Mixed 378
SusWrite 237
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 39.6
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$43
2TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 190 189 190 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 152
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 190
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
713GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT425U6AFR6C-PB HMT425U6AFR6C-PB Patriot PSD38G16002 Patriot PSD38G16002 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.3% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 22
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 21: 3R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 21% 34 190 30 60 72.3" 1280 720 TSB0206 TOSHIBA-TV
Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $540
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $399Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback