Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '22 at 09:17
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 962
93% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,522
94% 1,522 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2057 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 62.5
55% 65.9 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 62
54% 66 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 296 288 231 159 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 449
Mixed 450
SusWrite 239
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 57.8
193% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1310 1332 1308 1312 1317 1318 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,514
Write 1,378
Mixed 1058
SusWrite 1316
296% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 78.7
268% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 988
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 323
399% 708 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 264%
Great: 282%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
447GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 448 450 456 458 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 450
Mixed 404
SusWrite 453
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 47.9
164% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
682GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 144 150 151 157 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 145
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 36.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback