Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 20:40
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 267
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 814
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,084
67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 12E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.2% Good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 116
Parallax 71.7
68% 90.4 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 75.3
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 405 400 420 411 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 427
Mixed 393
SusWrite 393
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 45.7
152% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 182
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 125%
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
172GB free
Firmware: AP55
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 123 123 122 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 117
Mixed 70
SusWrite 122
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
149GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 73 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 72.1
Mixed 73
SusWrite 71.8
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 65%
WD WD3200BUDT-63DPZY0 320GB
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 75.3
Write 70.7
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 75.4
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 49%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
53GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 78.5
Write 95
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 87.8
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 43.1
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 40.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback