Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte B450 AORUS M (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '22 at 19:09
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 50,446 User benchmarks, average bench 75% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 182 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 465 51% 401 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D97) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Lighting 57.8 Reflection 58.8 Parallax 54.6 47% 57.1 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 52.3 Splatting 47.4 44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB 42,173 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 142 207 142 225 180 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 843 Write 694 Mixed 71.6 SusWrite 202 100% 453 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 33.4 130% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 536 DQ Mixed 315 267% 380 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 236%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 210GB free Firmware: GG2OACA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 49 47 50 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 63.7 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 49.3 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 7,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $94

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,430x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,314x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	555x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	500x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	430x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	422x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	202x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	170x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	166x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	413x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	274x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	249x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $374

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16