Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8780
Memory	58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220719
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 19:17
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-10885M 917 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 87.8 1-Core 147 2-Core 290 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 852 81% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,259 78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 562 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8780) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.2% Outstanding	Lighting 111 Reflection 180 Parallax 125 90% 139 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 107 Splatting 110 99% 122 fps
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1321 1857 1874 1923 1780 1806 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	303% Outstanding	Read 2,404 Write 2,250 Mixed 2,196 SusWrite 1,760 484% 2,152 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 69 230% 75.1 MB/s	DQ Read 770 DQ Write 470 DQ Mixed 633 468% 624 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 303% Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 2TB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2072 2253 2253 2219 2157 2127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	330% Outstanding	Read 2,390 Write 2,148 Mixed 2,188 SusWrite 2,180 502% 2,227 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 72.9 233% 76 MB/s	DQ Read 793 DQ Write 484 DQ Mixed 640 476% 639 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 330% Great: 526%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$580 3,612 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 6TB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 433 434 442 417 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 303 Write 219 Mixed 430 SusWrite 425 78% 344 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 45.6 148% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 344 260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	80.2% Excellent	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 25.5 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 26.2 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	204x
Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples	125x
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 90%, 562 samples	47x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	80x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	46x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 214%, 5,076 samples	36x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	45x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	44x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	25x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16