Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 171% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 148% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 96.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 203 80% 136 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 614 62% 501 Pts	64-Core 770 48% 770 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,280 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87B3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	205% Outstanding	Lighting 301 Reflection 287 Parallax 352 245% 313 fps	MRender 345 Gravity 249 Splatting 183 203% 259 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 205% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 245 252 241 251 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 496 Write 443 Mixed 365 SusWrite 265 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 32 122% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 71.2 DQ Mixed 165 137% 207 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 50GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 183 77 53 53 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 498 Write 441 Mixed 384 SusWrite 136 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 37.1 126% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 62.8 DQ Mixed 117 113% 189 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 58GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 93 61 62 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 360 Write 159 Mixed 170 SusWrite 76.1 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 27.7 97% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 57.8 DQ Mixed 122 93% 130 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 226GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1609 1005 569 594 591 594 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 2,420 Write 1,692 Mixed 1,431 SusWrite 827 354% 1,593 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 17.2 121% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 641 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 103 139% 270 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 85 80 84 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 173 Write 152 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 81.8 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 107%
Disco virtuale Microsoft 1GB 0GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 162 Write 150 Mixed 50.1 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 150% 1.23 MB/s

Flash USB Disk 4GB 539 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 3a04 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6 7.3 7 7 7.1 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 3.7 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 7 8% 7.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 8x4GB 392 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 48.7 MC Write 48.7 MC Mixed 44.4 135% 47.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 14.4 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 51 78% 51 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	542x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	385x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16