ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus A7K

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus A7K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK A7K
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070905
Uptime	24.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '17 at 20:13
Run Duration	105 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-64 193 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 62.4 34% 51 Pts	4-Core 59.4 8-Core 60.5 8% 60 Pts	64-Core 61.5 4% 61.5 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 487 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 256MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 4.17 2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 311 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 328 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 10 (AE) Unknown 100 100 48 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2591 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 53 43 244814643247 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2264254760 (F7) Unknown 100 100 70909771 (F8) Unknown 100 100 33308747	36% Below average	Read 205 Write 175 Mixed 173 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 10.6 54% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 30.2 DQ Mixed 10.5 12% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback