Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G4 DM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G4 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83EF
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400T-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 554
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.17 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 0.2
4% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 419 422 420 422 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,283
Write 1,000
Mixed 799
SusWrite 449
197% 882 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 66.9
221% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 936
696% 924 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 188%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G4 DM Builds (Compare 211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G4 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback