Asus A7K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus A7K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A7K
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070905
Uptime24.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '17 at 19:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-64
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 23.6
2-Core 28.2
31% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 46.7
8-Core 50.6
6% 48.7 Pts
64-Core 62.7
4% 62.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Asus(1043 1562) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.81
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 4.13
2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 201
Write 178
Mixed 171
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 9.58
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 26.3
DQ Mixed 9.07
11% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.5
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback