| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190119 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 07 '22 at 19:04 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
67.3%
Good
|
63% 108 Pts
|
49% 406 Pts
|
50% 805 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
175%
Outstanding
|
195% 258 fps
|
189% 241 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 24 69 84 29 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
26% 113 MB/s
|
47% 15.9 MB/s
|
17% 22.6 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
73GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 81 80 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
61% 82.3 MB/s
|
174% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
118GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 91 90 91 89 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
64% 87.3 MB/s
|
135% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
85%
Excellent
|
96% 33.6 GB/s
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
48% 82.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 706x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 278x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 263x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 614x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |