HP Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2009
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 11:13
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 42
2-Core 94.1
39% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 94.2
8-Core 118
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 57%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256MAZ-1AE1ZABHA 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 312 309 301 306 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 332
Write 306
Mixed 246
SusWrite 301
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 158
121% 163 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 715245-372 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Elite x2 1011 G1 Tablet

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback