Asus X99-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E (all builds)
Memory	57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '17 at 16:49
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 546 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 43.2 2-Core 90.4 30% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 374 33% 280 Pts	64-Core 1,376 85% 1,376 Pts
Poor: 55% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.95 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.4 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 33.7 21% 27.4 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 30.7 Splatting 22.4 24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 62 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 199978096	56.3% Above average	Read 436 Write 369 Mixed 402 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 10.3 52% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 9.6 11% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 225GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 73.6 Write 76.7 Mixed 72.7 96% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 13.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.23 GB/s	Latency 834 5% 834 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	270x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	88x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	22x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $603

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16