Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 07:56
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 236
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 643
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 110
Parallax 180
94% 135 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 134
Splatting 76
80% 101 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 128 129 114 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 468
Write 133
Mixed 120
SusWrite 121
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 19.4
116% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 51.4
83% 165 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
31GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 134 51 44 51 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 491
Write 444
Mixed 427
SusWrite 128
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 31.8
154% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 47.8
98% 193 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.2
Mixed 5
2% 3.1 MB/s
4K Write 0.3
17% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
51GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 35 33 31 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 102
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 33.1
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
186GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 92 91 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 76.9
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 90.3
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 25.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 17.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback