Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 00:08
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 372
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 51.7
50% 66 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 63.6
54% 66 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 306
Write 147
Mixed 193
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 32.3
105% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 133
108% 154 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Intel 330 Series 240GB
75GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 151 153 151 137 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 291
Write 145
Mixed 181
SusWrite 142
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 27.5
95% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 170
131% 182 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
186GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 94 96 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 92
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 93.8
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 58%
Toshiba MK5076GSX -63 500GB
338GB free
Firmware: GS101X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 73.6
Write 73.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 67
43% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $782
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback