-- --

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	-- -- (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DG41RQ
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 17:24
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% J2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 31.6 2-Core 47.5 36% 49.5 Pts	4-Core 49.8 8-Core 63.4 7% 56.6 Pts	64-Core 67.3 4% 67.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 25769804021 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 176095297577 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 100 Mixed 49.8 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.02 4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 465GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 215 (03) Spinup time 142 133 3875 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3298 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3601 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3199 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 663 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2634 (C2) HDA temperature 102 89 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 13952 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	61.2% Good	Read 105 Write 109 Mixed 78.2 72% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.32 83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 500GB 1,703 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 81GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 25.6 Mixed 25.6 34% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.26 4K Mixed 0.05 11% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

-- --

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)