Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$147
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 243
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 749
70% 585 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 110
Parallax 125
94% 117 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 115
Splatting 102
101% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,013
Write 1,633
Mixed 1,251
362% 1,632 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 79.7
264% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 1,075
810% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
793GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1045 926 975 972 971 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 897
Write 974
Mixed 939
SusWrite 1,025
217% 959 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 70.1
236% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,377
DQ Write 1,003
DQ Mixed 1,181
885% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 225%
Great: 303%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
12GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 103 103 103 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 102
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 70%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback