PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A1 |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130920 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 21 '17 at 11:14 |
Run Duration | 89 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
79.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.82
|
6.53%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.4%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 71x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 15x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |