Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220512
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '22 at 08:21
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64% Good	Memory 57.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 219 71% 132 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 658 63% 518 Pts	64-Core 675 42% 675 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.8.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 21.7 13% 21.8 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 24.9 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Zadak TWSG3 128GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 117 101 87 84 92 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 1,539 Write 513 Mixed 608 SusWrite 137 153% 699 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 25.9 138% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 402 DQ Write 513 DQ Mixed 329 284% 415 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 162%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 457GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 83 69 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 93.3 Write 92 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 80.5 57% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x8GB 1,416 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 10.6 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	223x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	107x
Core i3-10105FIntelBench 82%, 14,843 samples	90x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	79x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x

SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	34x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
M.2 SSD 256GBSpccBench 68%, 1,384 samples	21x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	26x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	22x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $372

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16