Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 11 cores, 22 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 156 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 446 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 997 62% 997 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 380 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 063B) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 0.4 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 143 107 164 158 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.9% Below average	Read 186 Write 147 Mixed 114 SusWrite 152 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 19.7 67% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 77.8 DQ Mixed 25.9 27% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 88%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 514GB free Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 82 82 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 81.7 Write 77.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 81.5 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965516-479.A00G ID:01 98 9965516-479.A00G ID:01 98 9965516-479.A00G ID:01 98 9965516-479.A00G 98GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.2% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 9.1 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16