Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 18:25
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$172
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 115
2-Core 243
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 709
73% 587 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$246
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 128
Parallax 128
96% 125 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 100
Splatting 97
86% 112 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91%
Great: 95%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$109
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 228 222 228 213 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1679
Write 1,196
Mixed 975
SusWrite 274
229% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 37
141% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 224
246% 440 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 151%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$260
643GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 389 382 407 369 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 422
Mixed 409
SusWrite 377
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 34.6
123% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 175
144% 215 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
26GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 146 154 141 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 499
Write 153
Mixed 213
SusWrite 145
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 12
73% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 20.2
58% 137 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 125%
WDC WDS500G1R0A-68A4W0 500GB
382GB free
Firmware: 411000WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 260 258 265 255 255 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 490
Write 411
Mixed 324
SusWrite 271
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 26.3
103% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 86.6
DQ Mixed 155
134% 207 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 23.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 45: 9R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 41% 22 311 232 60 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
History: Score 31: 6R 0G 1B | Score 45: 9R 0G 0B
Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $935
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Crucial MX500 250GB $38
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $375Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $41Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Extreme 16GB $17
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback