Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Memory 25.7 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 71.9 27% 48.1 Pts	4-Core 72.3 8-Core 80.4 10% 76.4 Pts	64-Core 86.5 5% 86.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1360) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1.2 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GB 4,828 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 132 124 55 21 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 370 Write 205 Mixed 294 SusWrite 98 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 23.1 67% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 162 131% 189 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 1315 CT8G4SFRA266.C8FP 12GB 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 281 14% 281 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	223x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	90x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	52x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	370x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	122x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	81x
OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GBKingstonBench 107%, 304 samples	61x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	47x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16