Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 151% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 196% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI (all builds)
Memory	50.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220218
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '22 at 08:34
Run Duration	353 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 235 78% 142 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 895 81% 680 Pts	64-Core 2,696 167% 2,696 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% MSI(1462 3884) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	192% Outstanding	Lighting 278 Reflection 254 Parallax 314 226% 282 fps	MRender 315 Gravity 238 Splatting 175 191% 242 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB 4,401 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2.5TB free Firmware: KQ000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 119 161 160 162 162 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 150 Write 198 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 142 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 0.6 6% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 20%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 451GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1552 1444 1459 1564 1558 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	226% Outstanding	Read 1853 Write 1,815 Mixed 1,969 SusWrite 1,506 403% 1,786 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 41.9 138% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 572 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 314 251% 363 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 488%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB 22,361 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 74GB free Firmware: SS0411BB SusWrite @10s intervals: 1069 781 744 782 814 754 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,722 Write 1,141 Mixed 134 SusWrite 824 211% 955 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 48.4 157% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 592 DQ Write 402 DQ Mixed 498 371% 497 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 370%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1709 1735 1522 1300 1303 1348 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,781 Write 1,564 Mixed 1,285 SusWrite 1,486 344% 1,529 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 52.2 163% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 588 DQ Write 388 DQ Mixed 504 371% 493 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 410%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 122GB free Firmware: DXM04B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 363 361 362 367 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 400 Write 336 Mixed 276 SusWrite 364 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 25.4 91% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 118 112% 175 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 116%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: FP1R SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 170 169 166 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 163 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 163 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 400% 3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 104%
LD-CT CT 8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2.3 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 7 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 2.5 9% 7.32 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.8 116% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GFX 4x16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 35.4 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 25.6 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 205%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 247%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	196x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $250Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	130x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	28x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	40x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	36x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	33x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	70x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	55x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GBCorsairBench 86%, 10,968 samples	12x
KF3600C18D4/32GX 2x31.5GBKingstonBench 104%, 1,924 samples	10x
Skill Intl F4-3600C18-32GTZN 4x31.8GBGBench 108%, 372 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $1,820

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16