Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 198 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 487 52% 413 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 354.56 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 236GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 394 Mixed 226 82% 372 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 41 137% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 99.4 108% 182 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 134%
Dell PERC H310 1TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 472GB free Firmware: 2.12 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 248 Write 248 Mixed 215 178% 237 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron-002C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 4x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 40.1 MC Mixed 35.5 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16