Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 178 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 459 46% 375 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570 12,360 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90B6) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 5.7 5% 6.3 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 5.2 4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 444 445 443 439 451 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 450 Mixed 364 SusWrite 445 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 35.2 113% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 356 271% 365 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 227 samples	10x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	8x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	8x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $543

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16