Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150818
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '22 at 08:07
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 207 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 395 53% 397 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 38.5 30% 39.1 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 27.5 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6291 Write 4,247 Mixed 4,826 1,136% 5,121 MB/s	4K Read 440 4K Write 204 4K Mixed 221 1,058% 288 MB/s	DQ Read 1,436 DQ Write 1,021 DQ Mixed 1,208 908% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
ST1000DM003-1CH162 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 389GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 465 466 465 439 295 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 494 Write 442 Mixed 446 SusWrite 432 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 51.9 176% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 96% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 264GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 465 466 465 440 292 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 471 Mixed 449 SusWrite 432 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 54.1 180% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 360 270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.3% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 18.1 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87M-D3H Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87M-D3H

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	160x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	82x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	70x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	20x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	18x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16