Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX517ZM
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '22 at 06:15
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	93%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12650H 16,339 User benchmarks, average bench 96% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 55.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 205 65% 121 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 693 66% 545 Pts	64-Core 1,076 67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1C6C) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	8.77% Terrible	Lighting 15 Reflection 103 Parallax 19.5 12% 46 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 6 Splatting 1 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.77% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB 18,245 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1349 1405 1277 518 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 1,508 Write 1,454 Mixed 1,063 SusWrite 1,000 282% 1,256 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 63.9 222% 80.2 MB/s	DQ Read 433 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 400 322% 450 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 297%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB 26,893 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	123% Outstanding	MC Read 52.3 MC Write 49 MC Mixed 47.7 142% 49.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 19.8 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM Builds (Compare 1,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

CPU
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples	1,404x
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples	128x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	857x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples	671x
RTX 3090-TiNvidiaBench 232%, 16,406 samples	2x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	608x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	290x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBNvmeBench 208%, 3,489 samples	262x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	759x
HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 121%, 4,275 samples	134x
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 2,622 samples	99x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16