| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Latitude E6420 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 032T9K |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180914 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 11 '22 at 03:34 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.6%
Good
|
64% 108 Pts
|
40% 326 Pts
|
25% 404 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0493) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.72%
Terrible
|
2% 1.97 fps
|
2% 2.13 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 68 74 76 73 74 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
29% 128 MB/s
|
54% 17.4 MB/s
|
14% 18.2 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
5GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 4.2 5.6 6.4 5.2 3.9 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
21% 17.6 MB/s
|
110% 2.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
55.2%
Above average
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
52% 77.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6420 Builds (Compare 2,164 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6420
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 1,061x |
| Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 306x |
| Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples | 194x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 1,632x |
| NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples | 355x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 157x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $62 |