| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
| System | Micro-Star GF63 Thin 9SCXR |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16R4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201105 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '22 at 23:42 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 65% |
| CPU Throttled | 99% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
|
44.2%
Average
|
38% 53.1 Pts
|
12% 92 Pts
|
6% 105 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
28% 35.2 fps
|
26% 33.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
37.4%
Below average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
20% 6.97 GB/s
|
44% 90.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 2,924 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples | 907x |
| Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples | 740x |
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples | 537x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples | 1,123x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 672x |
| GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 1,659 samples | 617x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |